Home / Journal
Educational publishing
Journal
Essays on the material in our collection, and on a recurring theme it keeps raising: that scientific images are rarely neutral records. They are arguments, and they are frequently doing the reasoning.
-
The book that taught people to believe a drawing
Micrographia is remembered for coining the word “cell.” Its real achievement was persuading strangers to trust an instrument they had no way of checking — and Hooke was candid that his plates were composites.
-
Every painter had the horse wrong
In 1878 a row of cameras beside a Palo Alto track settled a narrow question about a trotting horse, and convicted several centuries of painters of drawing a pose that does not occur.
-
A rift nobody wanted to find
Marie Tharp plotted a valley running down the center of the Atlantic seafloor and was told it was girl talk. It was the first clear outline of plate tectonics.
-
The most misread map in medicine
Snow’s cholera map did not discover the pump, it was not his strongest evidence, and the handle came off after the outbreak had already turned. The real story is better.
-
Drawings that were arguments
Cajal’s drawings of nerve tissue asserted a gap between cells that no microscope of his era could resolve. He was right, on evidence that did not compel the conclusion.
These five essays were published together on 29 July 2026 as the Journal’s opening group. We would rather publish a small number of pieces we can defend line by line than a large number we cannot.